Aluminum MacBooks vs. White MacBooks

Lately, many of our customers have been asking about the precise differences between the MacBooks with the new aluminum case design, and the $999 MacBook that has the older white, polycarbonate case design. Below I cover the most significant differences, then give a summary of what it all means.

Aluminum specs in bold on the left, vs white plastic specs on the right:

Unibody aluminum enclosure vs plastic white polycarbonate enclosure

2.0 or 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo Penryn processors vs 2.1 Intel Core 2 Duo Penryn processor

– Both have 3MB level of “on chip” 2 cache

1066 MHz frontside bus vs 800 MHz frontside bus

NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics with 256MB of shared RAM, vs Intel GMA X3100 with 144MB graphics

2GB of RAM (as two 1GB chips) standard vs 1GB of RAM (as two 512MB chips) standard

Faster PC8500 SO DIMM RAM vs slower (but considerably less expensive) PS5300 SO DIMM RAM

Max of 6GB of RAM (with one 2GB chip and one 6GB chip) vs max of 4GB RAM

DisplayPort connector vs mini-DVI connector

Glass trackpad with new and advanced multitouch input vs trackpad limited to two-finger input

Glossy glass display vs glossy plastic display

Instant-on LED backlighting vs LCD backlighting

No FireWire 400 port vs one FireWire 400 port

Both MacBook models have very similar processor speeds (indeed, the white model has a very-slightly faster processor). However, the newer MacBooks have a significantly faster bus speed (which is important, as the internal bus dictates how quickly the other components on the motherboard can communicate with the processor, and each other.) The newer MacBooks also use faster RAM.

More significantly, the aluminum MacBooks use the Nvidia 9400M chipset and boast graphics performance up to 6.2x faster over the white MacBook which uses the integrated 144MB Intel graphics chipset. Video gamers and image / video editors will see the improved graphics performance. Also, speed and responsiveness of core graphics in OS X are also improved with the Nvidia chipset, though most people will not notice the difference.

Even with these improvements, real-world testing shows that the aluminum MacBooks are only modestly faster than the white plastic MacBooks. Benchmarks show about a 9% speed difference. MacWorld magazine ran Speedmark version 5 tests on the aluminum MacBooks and the 2.1GHz white MacBook and reports that “Comparing the top of line 2.4 GHz MacBook to its less expensive, lower-powered 2 GHz sibling, we find the high-end model nearly 9 percent faster in overall Speedmark performance, with narrower performance gaps in graphics tests and wider gaps in processor tests, like Cinema 4D.”

It’s also interesting to note that Macworld magazine showed that the current white MacBook is about 4x faster that the final, top of the line PowerPC-based PowerBook – for half the price.

Ultimately, many people are going to choose the newer, aluminum MacBooks simply for their innovative design. Others will want to save a little money, don’t mind (or enjoy) the older white design, or need a compact notebook with a FireWire 400 port to support older video cameras.

Similar Posts

  • Print and Scan Setup in Snow Leopard

    Note: this article originally ran in Small Dog’s Tech Tails newsletter. Reprinted here because it’s very useful for Mac users in general. Mac…

  • iCloud Coming October 12

    iCloud stores your music, photos, documents, and more and wirelessly pushes them to all your devices. Automatic, effortless, and seamless—it just works. Well,…

  • Apple Mighty Mouse Woes

    For some reason the scroll down on my Mighty Mouse just decided to stop functioning. The scroll up and sideways worked just fine….

  • Office for Mac 2011: What's the Difference?

    Yesterday, Microsoft released several different editions of their Office for Mac 2011 software suite. If the whirlwind of differing editions and licenses left…

  • Skull Candy Headphones Review

    By Katie@Smalldog.com (posted by Ed, written by Katie@smalldog.com) Wow. Let me just tell you, I could not be more happy to be carrying…

  • Early Thoughts on My iPad

    I am love with my iPad. It is easily the coolest gadget I have ever bought. After having spent the last few days playing with it non-stop, I have a much better sense of what it is and what it isn’t, as well as what its potential can be. I think the best way to explain my sense of this devil is to tell you about how I’ve been using it.

    This is hands down the best device I’ve ever browsed the web on. The other night My roommates were out and I spent the evening chilling on the couch with my iPad just surfing my usual sights and listening to some iTunes. There was no TV in the background or anything. It felt every bit as intimate and cozy as curling up with a favorite book and enjoying peace and quiet. I’ve never had that homey feeling with my laptop.

    The potential for games is also amazing, especially social games. The iPad was made to be passed around. Some friends and I were chatting in the living room while idly passing around the iPad and playing Worms HD. Each person would simply take their turn and then pass it to the next while the conversation simply filled the spaces in between. It didn’t have the dominating presence of a TV.

    I’ve been using the Pages app as much as possible to see what kind of working potential this device has. I’ll admit that if I needed to really get a full paper done, referencing lots of sources and actively researching at the same time, I would choose a full computer anytime. But I have my iMac or MacBook Pro for that.

    However, for writing a simple review like this one, or responding to quick emails, the iPad is a pleasure to use. Basically I’ve learned that the iPad is not a laptop. If you need to multitask with lots of windows and things going on, you want a computer. But if you just need to be able to reference or adjust documents, or keep in touch, or search the web on the go, the iPad has the possibility of replacing a laptop in a multiple computer set up. I have not opened my laptop once since I got this thing, though I did use my iMac once to write up a paper for school.

    Most of all though, I’m loving the simple things. Listening to programs with the NPR app, or browsing the gorgeously simple New York Times editor’s choice app is great over breakfast, and feels much more natural than sitting in front of my computer. Streaming ABC or Netflix videos is incredibly easy, as is downloading and reading Marvel Comics.

    It may sound like this is turning into just a list of my favorite apps which all do things I could do before, but that’s the point. The iPad is not about innovation in content, it’s about the experience and that experience is provided by the apps that developers put out. I hope developers keep up the good work, because so far the experience has been simply wonderful.