Fair (and unfair) Use of Internet Images

Using Images From The Internet

Recently there’s been a fair amount of controversy over the use of uncredited images sourced from the Internet. Shepard Fairey’s use of an AP photo to create the now-iconic Obama Hope poster has especially been in the news. Fairey’s appropriation of the image was intentional, and he altered the photo so much that it effectively became an all-new image. Still, this does bring up the question of what is considered fair use of images sourced from the web.

At Small Dog we recently made the mistake of using an image without attribution in our Tech Tails newsletter. It was a photo of a tasty glass of Shed beer on Flickr, from Flickr / Twitter user Found_drama.

In this case, the rights of image owner were very clear. He used a Creative Commons copyright license that allowed for sharing, remixing, and sharing the work (under the same license) as long as it was for noncommercial use and had attribution. You can read the specific license by clicking here.

You’ve probably seen Creative Commons-tagged images and documents while surfing the web. Creative Commons is an excellent (and free) service that lets “authors, scientists, artists, and educators easily mark their creative work with the freedoms they want it to carry. You can use CC to change your copyright terms from All Rights Reserved to Some Rights Reserved.”

It’s very easy to read CC licenses to determine if you can use someone else’s image or other work in your own projects. But how do you determine if you can use images that don’t have CC license, or any other obvious trademark or copyright? After all, it’s exceedingly easy to find, copy, manipulate, and share digital images.

At Small Dog, most of our images are sourced from our own photos, directly from companies like Apple (with copyright provisions as part of our reseller agreement), stock photo libraries such as iStockphoto, and from boxed stock photos like Adobe Stock Photos and the Big Box of Art. We tend to get a lot of photos directly from the manufactures of the gear we sell. Sometime we also use other people’s photos with attribution.

In most cases, it’s wise to assume photos and images you find online are indeed copy written. Click here to read a good article about this subject, including Fair Use of images and information.

You can also read about Fair Use on Wikipedia by clicking here.

We’re going to write more about this subject in this week’s Kibbles and Bytes Newsletter. For now, we wanted to acknowledge the importance of the issue. And, you know, to apologize to Found_drama for using his image without attribution. It was great he used a Creative Commons license for the image.

Similar Posts

  • Sunday Drive

    Ahh! What can be better than a Sunday drive after visiting the grandparents? I was headed home and listening to my iPod mini…

  • Packet Garden

    While looking around on Digg this afternoon I found a neat application called Packet Garden. The applications builds a world that has plants…

  • Concept: Cell Phone Made with Blocks

    An interesting video was shown to me by a coworker the other day. There’s currently a YouTube video circulating the internet that tries…

  • Relief Efforts in Japan

    As the effects of the earthquake and tsunami in Japan continue to broaden in scope, the need for relief effort funding remains critical….

  • iPad Apps for Comics Fans

    People who get to know me notice two things about me immediately: that I love gadgets of all kinds and that I love…

  • A Proud Moment for America

    A young African American Senator and a former first lady—it has been an epic battle to secure the nomination of the Democratic Party…