Fair (and unfair) Use of Internet Images

Using Images From The Internet

Recently there’s been a fair amount of controversy over the use of uncredited images sourced from the Internet. Shepard Fairey’s use of an AP photo to create the now-iconic Obama Hope poster has especially been in the news. Fairey’s appropriation of the image was intentional, and he altered the photo so much that it effectively became an all-new image. Still, this does bring up the question of what is considered fair use of images sourced from the web.

At Small Dog we recently made the mistake of using an image without attribution in our Tech Tails newsletter. It was a photo of a tasty glass of Shed beer on Flickr, from Flickr / Twitter user Found_drama.

In this case, the rights of image owner were very clear. He used a Creative Commons copyright license that allowed for sharing, remixing, and sharing the work (under the same license) as long as it was for noncommercial use and had attribution. You can read the specific license by clicking here.

You’ve probably seen Creative Commons-tagged images and documents while surfing the web. Creative Commons is an excellent (and free) service that lets “authors, scientists, artists, and educators easily mark their creative work with the freedoms they want it to carry. You can use CC to change your copyright terms from All Rights Reserved to Some Rights Reserved.”

It’s very easy to read CC licenses to determine if you can use someone else’s image or other work in your own projects. But how do you determine if you can use images that don’t have CC license, or any other obvious trademark or copyright? After all, it’s exceedingly easy to find, copy, manipulate, and share digital images.

At Small Dog, most of our images are sourced from our own photos, directly from companies like Apple (with copyright provisions as part of our reseller agreement), stock photo libraries such as iStockphoto, and from boxed stock photos like Adobe Stock Photos and the Big Box of Art. We tend to get a lot of photos directly from the manufactures of the gear we sell. Sometime we also use other people’s photos with attribution.

In most cases, it’s wise to assume photos and images you find online are indeed copy written. Click here to read a good article about this subject, including Fair Use of images and information.

You can also read about Fair Use on Wikipedia by clicking here.

We’re going to write more about this subject in this week’s Kibbles and Bytes Newsletter. For now, we wanted to acknowledge the importance of the issue. And, you know, to apologize to Found_drama for using his image without attribution. It was great he used a Creative Commons license for the image.

Similar Posts

  • Haste Makes Waste

    In life there are many lessons, many of which have given birth to age old cliches. One I recently revisited is “Haste Makes…

  • Touch Me I'm Sensitive

    Since it’s been cold out, I like to use my driving gloves while in the car so I don’t have to worry about…

  • iPod + Red Sox

    Last weekend I read an article that combined two of my favorite things – the Red Sox and the iPod. The article details…

  • Using the iPhone on AT&T

    I’m down here on the beach with my iPhone and it’s A LOT speedier then in Vermont. It feels as if I am…

  • AppleCare…To the Rescue

    While Apple’s products have significantly lower rates of failure than a lot of their competition, things do go wrong from time to time. When I got my iPhone 4S at launch, it would occasionally restart itself. At first, I thought nothing of it, considering I was coming from an Android device that rebooted itself so often that it might as well have been saying, “Hey, just in case you forgot you customized your splash screen, here it is again!”

    A couple of weeks ago, my phone didn’t just restart itself, but became a useless brick until I gave it a hard reset while plugged in. A quick Google search revealed this issue to be a symptom of hardware failure known in the diagnosis log as “panic.plist.” I checked my diagnosis log and there it was, three “panic.plist” occurrences in the past week. After a brief phone call with AppleCare, I was given the choice of sending the phone back to them and waiting close to a week for a replacement or to have a $730 hold placed on my credit card while they sent me a new phone overnight. As I didn’t have another phone to use, I opted for the latter.

    Normally, to have a phone sent overnight would cost $30 but because I had AppleCare, the fee was waived. Cut to today; the hold has been lifted and I have a shiny new iPhone that has yet to give me an issue. Granted, I was within the original one year warranty, but had this happened after that first year, I would be scavenging Craigslist for a cheap replacement. Thanks, AppleCare–I owe you one.