Google Voice (Formerly Grand Central)

The latest in Google’s quest for world domination is a product called Google Voice. As with most of Google’s offerings, it’s free and solves a problem most people don’t even know they have.

Most of us have at least two phone numbers—a home phone and a cell phone. Some of us have a few work numbers, a second cell phone, and several lines at home. If your mother doesn’t know where you are and needs to say hello at that very instant, she can dial your Google Voice number, which in turn will ring each and every one of your phones at the same time.

If you’re in a meeting with only your iPhone, and silence mother’s call, she can leave you a voice message at your Google Voice mailbox. Since you’re in a meeting, but want to know what Mom called about, you can use your iPhone or laptop to check that voice mail. Sure, the voice message will be relayed to you as a sound file, but Google Voice goes one step further by actually transcribing the message. We can’t listen to voice messages in meetings, but we sure can check our email! Don’t want your voicemail delivered to your email? Have it transcribed and sent as an SMS message instead.

Of course, speech to text is tricky stuff. By far the best product I’ve used is MacSpeech’s Dictate software. I saw demonstrations of this in the middle of the Moscone Center at Macworld last year, and was amazed at the accuracy even amidst the loud bustle of a convention hall floor. However, it does require some significant training time (that is, you must train the software with your voice, and correct its mistakes for it to get better). Google’s speech-to-text technology has a low quality phone stream to work with, but requires no initial training, only correction to make it better.

I’d hate to be a big telecom firm in Google’s way, because Google Voice offers completely free domestic calling, with no annual or hidden fees whatsoever. International calls are mostly a few cents per minute.

The only downside is that Google Voice is available only to the members of a service once called Grand Central while it is in its earliest phase. Soon, though, it will be open to the public–with an invitation system similar to that used in the Gmail introduction.

Image credit: en.wikimedia.org

Similar Posts

  • Go to Hood, Get an iPad

    So, I’m indulging a bit here, but I felt compelled to report that a college from my hometown has decided to give incoming…

  • Play More Video Formats…

    I’m sure everybody has happened across a video file that they couldn’t play on their Mac because it was just unsupported. In the…

  • Google + Nest = Nest+?

    You may have heard that yesterday, Google acquired “*Nest,*”:https://nest.com the company most known for its smarter, simpler thermostat design. Reactions to the sale have been largely negative, at least according to “*fans of Nest on Facebook.*”:https://www.facebook.com/nest/posts/10152167824360681 What would this mean for your privacy? For device support (especially non-Google devices such as iPhone)? ARE WE ALL GOING TO BE WATCHED IN OUR HOMES?

    I’ve been intrigued by Nest’s thermostat design since it was developed by Nest Labs in 2011, and still believe that it has set a standard for innovation and what it means to have a “connected home” — a term that has proven to be highly sought after in the past few years. I mean, you can leave the over-the-top “smart” tech products at CES (except for the WeMo-enabled “*Belkin Crock-Pot*”:http://www.macrumors.com/2014/01/07/belkin-slow-cooker/ … I think I’d love that guy), but Nest makes a lot of sense for the average home.

    Recently, Nest Labs introduced a smarter “*smoke and carbon monoxide detector,*”:https://nest.com/smoke-co-alarm/life-with-nest-protect/ taking on another mundane household staple that they determined significant improvement (for the annoyance factor alone). That brings the total number of products to two. Two. For which Google paid 3.2 billion! Obviously, they were viewed as game-changers.

    So, what do you think Google plans to do with Nest? We’d love to hear your thoughts!

    More on the acquisition “*here.*”http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303595404579318952802236612

    More on the Facebook backlash “*here.*”:http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/most-nests-facebook-fans-dislike-google-deal-154974