Can Apple Achieve a Retina Display on the iPad?

When Apple adopted the retina display on the iPhone 4 last June, they made arguably one of the best computing displays every created. Simply the amount of pixels they are able to pack into a small 3.5-inch display is remarkable. The term retina was used because the pixels are packed so tightly, most human eyes cannot see them. This makes reading text much more pleasurable and renders photos and webpages with amazing detail.

There is no doubt Apple wants to put a retina display on the iPad. It would make the iPad not only the best tablet display (by an enormous margin), it would also challenge the computing market to step-up their display densities. One of the reasons pixel density matters less on laptops and desktops is you tend to sit further away from the screen, making it very difficult to see individual pixels. With devices like phones and tablets, a higher pixel-per-inch measurement means a more pleasant user experience, because they are being used closer to your face.

I can only imagine how great a retina display iPad would look. Simply put an iPhone 3GS next to an iPhone 4 to see the stark difference. However, it would take quite an engineering feat to pull it off. Take a look at some of Apple’s newest products with the PPI equated based on screen size and resolution:

The iPhone 4 leads the pack by a long shot, but even if the iPad 2 has double the resolution (quadrupling pixels – 2048×1536) the PPI would equal 263.92, still just under the 300 threshold used to distinguish a retina display. This would still make for a gorgeous tablet computer and help in two other key areas as well.

The first is app upgrades; doubling the resolution (as done with the iPhone) makes it much easier for developers to upgrade their apps. The second is Apple’s interest in selling magazines and newspapers on the iPad. A high-res screen, coupled with the iPad’s unique user interface, would make magazines and newspapers really come to life.

In the end, I don’t believe Apple can achieve a retina display on the iPad by exceeding 300 PPI, at least not in 2011. They may be able to achieve a doubling from the current resolution, but even that would take quite the processor and graphics upgrade (considering its about half the pixels as the 27-inch iMac). Either way, Apple is sure to surprise us in some manner in the coming months, and remind us why they design the best computing products today.

Similar Posts

  • iBank

    For the longest time, I hated working with my banking stuff and figuring everything out. Since then I’ve met and started dating a…

  • Apple Excitement and Steam for Mac

    As an Apple fan, I don’t think I’ve ever been as excited as I am now. If I could roll the clock ahead to April right now then I would, and woe be it to anyone who tried to stop me. Why am I so excited? Well, two things really.

    First, obviously, is the iPad. Somehow in the last week I have gone from staunch iPad skeptic to literally “in a froth” to get my hands on one (thanks Penny Arcade for the excellent descriptor of my frenzied state). I’ll be the first to admit that as it was presented it is a fairly unassuming device. It doesn’t really do anything that you can’t do with an iPhone and a MacBook, and falls awkwardly somewhere between. But oh, the promise! The sheer potential of such a device is astounding. My intent is to purchase one as a statement, if nothing else. A statement to developers that I need them to develop great apps for it. But enough about the iPad.

    What really has me excited for April is the announcement that Valve, creators of Half Life, Portal, and Left for Dead, will be bringing its steam delivery service to the Mac platform, and its Source engine along with it. If you’re a Mac gamer, or wish you were, then this is amazing news. It’s no secret that our platform of choice is routinely ignored by game developers.

    Apple themselves have also ignored us by refusing to offer us more powerful graphics options (yes, I really do need 1GB of VRAM). Blizzard has really been the sole supporter of Macs in the game realm, steadily releasing their Mac versions simultaneously with their Windows counterparts… on the same discs even. For a company the size of Valve to start building Mac-native versions of their games and really support the platform should encourage other companies to follow suit.

    It’s already panning out like I expected. Razer has already announced they will fully support Mac OS X with their line of gamer centric peripherals (I’m a huge fan of their mice). My guess is that next we’ll see some of the larger publishers such as EA and Ubisoft (though please leave your draconian DRM behind) start to pick up Mac knowledgeable programmers and start to build native versions of their games rather than the bogged down ports we receive now.

    Even if other developers don’t jump on board immediately, I can’t express in words how excited I am to be able to download my already large library of Source games without launching bootcamp first. And when Portal 2 releases around the holidays, I’ll finally be able to consider myself a Mac gamer instead of a gamer who likes Macs.

  • Picking the Right Mouse

    With the rising prominence of touchscreen based devices such as the iPad and iPhone, it is easy to overlook the significance of choosing…

  • SkillsUSA

    Over the past week, I have been in Kansas City, Missouri, competing at the National SkillsUSA competition. SkillsUSA is a worldwide organization that…