Time Machine Buddy

Apple knows how important it is to back up, so they created the Time Machine application. Pre-installed, user friendly, and set to perform seamless automatic backups every hour, Apple users no longer have an excuse to NOT back up their data.

However, as simple as Apple has made it to prevent catastrophic data loss, sometimes Time Machine just doesn’t behave. This becomes complicated because Apple doesn’t advertise immediate solutions on how to resolve the issue of your drive not completing scheduled back ups.

I thought I’d provide a simple solution that can save you a phone call to AppleCare. It’s called Time Machine Buddy — a free download from apple that gets installed within your widgets. What this neat little app does is provide a more in-depth look at the processes that occur during a time machine backup.

You can download the app here.

After you install it and save it to your dashboard, connect your drive and run a Time Machine back up, and watch Time Machine Buddy start logging the activity. Even though most of the computer language may seem foreign to the average user, there is one log in particular that’s worth looking for as your Time Machine progress bar runs on for infinity.

“Node requires deep traversal.” In a more simplified way, this means that Time Machine’s app is having an issue with saving backups to your drive. This can quickly be remedied with a reformat of your external drive, and re-running Time Machine.

Of course, this requires that you either save your most current back up to another destination, or that your current system is up to date with any important data. To reformat your drive, simply open up Disk Utility in the Applications < Utilities folder, select your problematic external drive, select the “Erase” tab. Once it completes the reformat, open up Time Machine, select the freshly formatted drive, and voila! Time Machine will resume its back ups successfully.

Similar Posts

  • My favorite utility, Quicksilver.

    By Matt@Smalldog.com I’m the kind of computer user who tries to use the mouse as little as possible. I know all the keyboard…

  • New Google feature

    Here’s a new feature that appears to have just been added to Google. When you search for a city name such as New…

  • Easy Website / Blog Creation Tools

    At Small Dog Electronics, we’re frequently asked how to create simple, easily maintained websites. There are many excellent reasons to build a website,…

  • xBox360 Gamertag Widget

    I just picked up an xBox360 a couple weeks ago, and finally this past weekend I got to use it. One feature of…

  • Google + Nest = Nest+?

    You may have heard that yesterday, Google acquired “*Nest,*”:https://nest.com the company most known for its smarter, simpler thermostat design. Reactions to the sale have been largely negative, at least according to “*fans of Nest on Facebook.*”:https://www.facebook.com/nest/posts/10152167824360681 What would this mean for your privacy? For device support (especially non-Google devices such as iPhone)? ARE WE ALL GOING TO BE WATCHED IN OUR HOMES?

    I’ve been intrigued by Nest’s thermostat design since it was developed by Nest Labs in 2011, and still believe that it has set a standard for innovation and what it means to have a “connected home” — a term that has proven to be highly sought after in the past few years. I mean, you can leave the over-the-top “smart” tech products at CES (except for the WeMo-enabled “*Belkin Crock-Pot*”:http://www.macrumors.com/2014/01/07/belkin-slow-cooker/ … I think I’d love that guy), but Nest makes a lot of sense for the average home.

    Recently, Nest Labs introduced a smarter “*smoke and carbon monoxide detector,*”:https://nest.com/smoke-co-alarm/life-with-nest-protect/ taking on another mundane household staple that they determined significant improvement (for the annoyance factor alone). That brings the total number of products to two. Two. For which Google paid 3.2 billion! Obviously, they were viewed as game-changers.

    So, what do you think Google plans to do with Nest? We’d love to hear your thoughts!

    More on the acquisition “*here.*”http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303595404579318952802236612

    More on the Facebook backlash “*here.*”:http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/most-nests-facebook-fans-dislike-google-deal-154974