VZW iPhone 4: "I'll Call You Right Back"

Looking up a restaurant location when your friend is on the line? Do they need directions really quickly and don’t want to hang up while you map it out? What if your friend is on ‘Who Wants To Be a Millionaire’ and uses you as a lifeline? Are you going to have to call Regis back after you Google the answer? If you decide to go with Verizon for the iPhone 4, plan to hang up in each of these scenarios.

Verizon’s CDMA network does not currently support network multitasking. This is the ability to process data simultaneously with a phone call. If you are in the middle of loading data, whether it is from Safari or any other Internet-based app, and you receive a phone call, the data is stopped. If you are already on a phone call and need access to said data, you must end the call first. This may not break the iPhone experience for Verizon customers, but it is certainly a luxury that AT&T users can enjoy.

This is not to say there aren’t any benefits to the Verizon version of the iPhone 4 though. If you aren’t grandfathered into unlimited data from AT&T the data package from Verizon may seem tempting. One way Verizon is staying competitive is by offering what AT&T once did—unlimited data. Although their data processing isn’t quite as fast yet, so far, the Verizon iPhone has been reviewed as having a better connection during phone calls. However, depending on your location you may or may not notice a difference between the two. Besides, who uses their phone for phone calls anyway?

Only time will which carrier has better success with the iPhone, but it’s safe to say that either way, Apple wins.

Is the lack of network multitasking a deal breaker for you? Comment below and let us know!

Similar Posts

  • Cha-Ching: Money Management on Mac

    I enjoyed using iBank for a long time, but a new application called Cha-Ching has popped up and really got my attention. It…

  • AT&T and iPhones in Vermont

    Yesterday Apple announced a much anticipated 3G iPhone, and for weeks now the iPhone has been unavailable for purchase from the Apple Store….

  • Backing up is SO not Hard to Do!

    We have talked too many times about how important maintaining a backup of your data is and just how easy it might be…

  • My iPod nano

    Until recently, I owned an iPod mini. I saw the iPod shuffle come out and decided I didn’t want one, and I am…

  • Apple Excitement and Steam for Mac

    As an Apple fan, I don’t think I’ve ever been as excited as I am now. If I could roll the clock ahead to April right now then I would, and woe be it to anyone who tried to stop me. Why am I so excited? Well, two things really.

    First, obviously, is the iPad. Somehow in the last week I have gone from staunch iPad skeptic to literally “in a froth” to get my hands on one (thanks Penny Arcade for the excellent descriptor of my frenzied state). I’ll be the first to admit that as it was presented it is a fairly unassuming device. It doesn’t really do anything that you can’t do with an iPhone and a MacBook, and falls awkwardly somewhere between. But oh, the promise! The sheer potential of such a device is astounding. My intent is to purchase one as a statement, if nothing else. A statement to developers that I need them to develop great apps for it. But enough about the iPad.

    What really has me excited for April is the announcement that Valve, creators of Half Life, Portal, and Left for Dead, will be bringing its steam delivery service to the Mac platform, and its Source engine along with it. If you’re a Mac gamer, or wish you were, then this is amazing news. It’s no secret that our platform of choice is routinely ignored by game developers.

    Apple themselves have also ignored us by refusing to offer us more powerful graphics options (yes, I really do need 1GB of VRAM). Blizzard has really been the sole supporter of Macs in the game realm, steadily releasing their Mac versions simultaneously with their Windows counterparts… on the same discs even. For a company the size of Valve to start building Mac-native versions of their games and really support the platform should encourage other companies to follow suit.

    It’s already panning out like I expected. Razer has already announced they will fully support Mac OS X with their line of gamer centric peripherals (I’m a huge fan of their mice). My guess is that next we’ll see some of the larger publishers such as EA and Ubisoft (though please leave your draconian DRM behind) start to pick up Mac knowledgeable programmers and start to build native versions of their games rather than the bogged down ports we receive now.

    Even if other developers don’t jump on board immediately, I can’t express in words how excited I am to be able to download my already large library of Source games without launching bootcamp first. And when Portal 2 releases around the holidays, I’ll finally be able to consider myself a Mac gamer instead of a gamer who likes Macs.